Functional correctness
How completely the parser implements the documented integer-range contract.
This test measures two abilities together: implementing a strict input contract and writing meaningful tests that catch plausible incorrect implementations, not merely the seeded defect.
Nomination prepared · results pendingTest assignment
The model receives a faulty parseRange(value) implementation and a public test file. It must repair the parser and extend the tests with cases strong enough to reject realistic broken variants.
start..end, with optional whitespace around the complete value.+ or - followed by digits.-100000 through 100000, inclusive.Each criterion receives 0–10. Public behavior, the objective evaluator, and mutation-test evidence remain separate from the manual score.
How completely the parser implements the documented integer-range contract.
How thoroughly the code and authored tests cover syntax, boundaries, reversed ranges, and invalid types.
How readable and focused both the parser and its test cases are.
How strictly the solution stays in the two allowed files without weakening or bypassing evaluation.
Overall is the arithmetic mean of the four scores.
This page defines the test before model execution. The future table will show public and objective results, mutation-test evidence, four review scores, time, cost, and runtime route.